by Philipp Berg, Samuel Voß, Gabor Janiga, Sylvia Saalfeld, Aslak W. Bergersen, Kristian Valen-Sendstad, Jan Bruening, Leonid Goubergrits, Andreas Spuler, Tin Lok Chiu, Anderson Chun On Tsang, Gabriele Copelli, Benjamin Csippa, György Paál, Gábor Závodszky, Felicitas J. Detmer, Bong J. Chung, Juan R. Cebral, Soichiro Fujimura, Hiroyuki Takao, Christof Karmonik, Saba Elias, Nicole M. Cancelliere, Mehdi Najafi, David A. Steinman, Vitor M. Pereira, Senol Piskin, Ender A. Finol, Mariya Pravdivtseva, Prasanth Velvaluri, Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz, Nikhil Paliwal, Hui Meng, Santhosh Seshadhri, Sreenivas Venguru, Masaaki Shojima, Sergey Sindeev, Sergey Frolov, Yi Qian, Yu-An Wu, Kent D. Carlson, David F. Kallmes, Dan Dragomir-Daescu, Oliver Beuing
Abstract:
Assessing the rupture probability of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains challenging. Therefore, hemodynamic simulations are increasingly applied toward supporting physicians during treatment planning. However, due to several assumptions, the clinical acceptance of these methods remains limited.
Reference:
Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH) - phase II: rupture risk assessment (Philipp Berg, Samuel Voß, Gabor Janiga, Sylvia Saalfeld, Aslak W. Bergersen, Kristian Valen-Sendstad, Jan Bruening, Leonid Goubergrits, Andreas Spuler, Tin Lok Chiu, Anderson Chun On Tsang, Gabriele Copelli, Benjamin Csippa, György Paál, Gábor Závodszky, Felicitas J. Detmer, Bong J. Chung, Juan R. Cebral, Soichiro Fujimura, Hiroyuki Takao, Christof Karmonik, Saba Elias, Nicole M. Cancelliere, Mehdi Najafi, David A. Steinman, Vitor M. Pereira, Senol Piskin, Ender A. Finol, Mariya Pravdivtseva, Prasanth Velvaluri, Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz, Nikhil Paliwal, Hui Meng, Santhosh Seshadhri, Sreenivas Venguru, Masaaki Shojima, Sergey Sindeev, Sergey Frolov, Yi Qian, Yu-An Wu, Kent D. Carlson, David F. Kallmes, Dan Dragomir-Daescu, Oliver Beuing), In International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2019.
Bibtex Entry:
@article{berg_multiple_2019,
title = {Multiple {Aneurysms} {AnaTomy} {CHallenge} 2018 ({MATCH}) - phase {II}: rupture risk assessment},
issn = {1861-6429},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01986-2},
doi = {10.1007/s11548-019-01986-2},
abstract = {Assessing the rupture probability of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains challenging. Therefore, hemodynamic simulations are increasingly applied toward supporting physicians during treatment planning. However, due to several assumptions, the clinical acceptance of these methods remains limited.},
journal = {International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery},
author = {Berg, Philipp and Voß, Samuel and Janiga, Gabor and Saalfeld, Sylvia and Bergersen, Aslak W. and Valen-Sendstad, Kristian and Bruening, Jan and Goubergrits, Leonid and Spuler, Andreas and Chiu, Tin Lok and Tsang, Anderson Chun On and Copelli, Gabriele and Csippa, Benjamin and Paál, György and Závodszky, Gábor and Detmer, Felicitas J. and Chung, Bong J. and Cebral, Juan R. and Fujimura, Soichiro and Takao, Hiroyuki and Karmonik, Christof and Elias, Saba and Cancelliere, Nicole M. and Najafi, Mehdi and Steinman, David A. and Pereira, Vitor M. and Piskin, Senol and Finol, Ender A. and Pravdivtseva, Mariya and Velvaluri, Prasanth and Rajabzadeh-Oghaz, Hamidreza and Paliwal, Nikhil and Meng, Hui and Seshadhri, Santhosh and Venguru, Sreenivas and Shojima, Masaaki and Sindeev, Sergey and Frolov, Sergey and Qian, Yi and Wu, Yu-An and Carlson, Kent D. and Kallmes, David F. and Dragomir-Daescu, Dan and Beuing, Oliver},
month = may,
year = {2019}
}